Impact of dietary milk thistle (Silybum marianum) seed powder on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and carcass cuts of Karadi lambs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31530/cjnst.2026.2.1.1Keywords:
Milk thistle seed, Bioactive compounds, Lamb growth, Carcass traitsAbstract
Abstract
Background: Karadi lambs usually have slow growth and only fair carcass yields because of local environmental and genetic factors. Milk Thistle Seed Powder (MTSP), which possesses antioxidant, antimicrobial, and hepatoprotective (liver-protecting) properties due to its bioactive compounds, could be added to feed to help improve performance and meat quality.
Aims: This study assesses how dietary MTSP impacts the growth, carcass properties, and cut yields of Karadi lambs.
Methodology: This study used twenty Karadi male lambs, aged four to five months, with an initial average body weight of 25 ± 1 kg. The lambs were randomly assigned to four groups and fed diets containing 0%, 1%, 2%, and 3% milk thistle seed powder over a ninety-one-day period. The study measured lamb growth, carcass traits, and carcass cuts. Statistical analysis using Duncan’s Multiple Range Method (MRM) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) showed that milk thistle seed powder supplementation had a measurable impact on most of the traits studied. The first two principal components accounted for over 99% of the total variation and separated the groups by MTSP level.
Results: Karadi lambs supplemented with 2–3% MTSP surpassed the control group in Average Daily Gain (ADG), feed conversion ratio (P ≤ 0.05), hot carcass weight, cold carcass weight and dressing percentages (P ≤ 0.01), as compared to the control group lambs. Improved carcass yield was demonstrated by larger major primal cuts like the leg, loin, and shoulder. Lambs fed 1% Milk thistle seed supplementation showed moderate improvements, while control group had the poorest performance.
Conclusion: Generally, adding 2–3% MTSP improved growth, feed conversion ratio, and carcass characteristics in Karadi lambs, confirming that milk thistle seed can be a practical natural feed additive for better ruminant performance.
References
[1] The State of Food and Agriculture (FAO): Overcoming water challenges in agriculture. Rome: Food and Agri-culture Organization of the United Nations, 2020. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb1447en.
[2] D. A. O. Al-Sherwany, & J. E. Alkass. The impact of docking Karadi lambs on growth performance, carcass traits and body composition. Iraqi Journal of Agricul-tural Sciences, 53(3), 625–635, 2022. https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v53i3.1572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v53i3.1572
[3] L. Abenavoli, A. A. Izzo, N. Milic, C. Cicala, A. San-tini, & R. Capasso. Milk thistle (Silybum marianum): A concise overview on its chemistry, pharmacological, and nutraceutical uses in liver diseases. Phytotherapy Research, 32(11), 2202–2213, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12091085. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.6171
[4] H. J. Hamasalim. Synbiotic as feed additives relating to animal health and performance. Advances in Microbi-ology, 6(04), 288, 2016. https://doi.org/10.4236/aim.2016.64028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/aim.2016.64028
[5] J. Wang, L. Deng, M. Chen, Y. Che, L. Li, L. Zhu, G. Chen, & T. Feng. Phytogenic feed additives as natural antibiotic alternatives in animal health and production: A review of the literature of the last decade. Animal Nutrition, 17, 244–264, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2024.01.012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2024.01.012
[6] M. Piao, Y. Tu, N. Zhang, Q. Diao, & Y. Bi. Advances in the Application of Phytogenic Extracts as Antioxi-dants and Their Potential Mechanisms in Ruminants. Antioxidants, 12(4), 879, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12040879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12040879
[7] E. H. ElSabaawy, M. I. Mohamed, W. M. Abd El-Wahab, Y. A. El-Nomeary, & N. A. Hassaan. Effect of milk thistle extract supplementation on growth per-formance, nutrient digestibility, and blood parameters of growing Shami goats. Egyptian Journal of Nutrition and Feeds, 25(3), 323–331, 2022. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejnf.2022.286667. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/ejnf.2022.286667
[8] M. T. Lambo, R. Liu, X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Y. Li, & M. Sun. Nutritional evaluation of milk thistle meal as a protein feedstuff for diets of dairy cattle. Animals, 14(13), 1864, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14131864. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14131864
[9] P. M. Rayni, A. Zarei, O. Dayani, & M. Soflaei Shahrbabak. Growth performance, carcass traits, and physicochemical characteristics of Longissimus thorac-is of fattening lambs feeding milk thistle (Silybum marianum) seed powder. Small Ruminant Research, 227, 107082, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2023.107082. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2023.107082
[10] European Parliament, & Council of the European Un-ion. Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the pro-tection of animals used for scientific purposes. Official Journal of the European Union, L 276, 33–79, 2010. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2010/63/oj/eng.
[11] AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC Inter-national (18th ed.). Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Gaithersburg, MD, USA. 2005.
[12] H. J. Hamasalim & Kh. M. Hassan. Evaluation of Nu-tritional Value of Animal Feed by Near-Infrared Spec-troscopy (NIR) and Multivariate Analysis. Sulaimani Journal for Pure and Applied Sciences, 27(1), 1–9, 2025. file:///C:/Users/HP/Downloads/FDCE-article%201-9%20(4).pdf
[13] J. Viktorova, M. Stranska-Zachariasova, M. Fenclova, L. Vitek, J. Hajslova, V. Kren, & T. Ruml. Complex evaluation of antioxidant capacity of milk thistle die-tary supplements. Antioxidants, 8(8), 317, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox8080317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox8080317
[14] NRC (National Research Council). Nutrient require-ments of small ruminants: Sheep, goats, cervids, and new world camelids. Washington, DC: National Acad-emies Press, 2007. https://doi.org/10.17226/11654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17226/11654
[15] U.S. Department of Agriculture. (n.d.). Average daily gain (ADG) in preweaned Holstein heifer calves. USDA, 2014. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/sites/default/files/adg-preweaned-holstein-heifer.pdf.
[16] U.S. Department of Agriculture. NOP 5017-1: Calcu-lating dry matter intake from pasture. Agricultural Marketing Service, 2018. https://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/5017-1.pdf.
[17] D. W. Shike. Beef cattle feed efficiency. Iowa State University, 2015. https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/dd9ecb91-917e-4167-8c70-f3d638978b57/content.
[18] I. T. Jolliffe, & J. Cadima. Principal component analy-sis: A review and recent developments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 374(2065), 20150202, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0202.
[19] M. A. Zayed, M. F. Shehata, I. M. Ismail, M. Mo-hammady, & M. A. Radwan. Assessment of growth performance, ultrasound measurements, carcass merits and meat quality of Barki lambs at different weaning weights. Journal of Animal Health and Production, 10(4), 420–430, 2022. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.jahp/2022/10.4.420.430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.jahp/2022/10.4.420.430
[20] J. Huang, S. Jiao, Y. Fu, W. Zhao, Q. Diao, T. Ma, & N. Zhang. Effect of feeding level on growth and slaughter performance, and allometric growth of tis-sues and organs in female growing Saanen dairy goats. Animals, 14(5), 730, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14050730. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14050730
[21] C. E. Agbangba, E. Sacla Aide, H. Honfo & R. Glèlè Kakai. On the use of post-hoc tests in environmental and biological sciences: A critical review. Heliyon, 10(3), e25131. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25131
[22] I. T. Jolliffe & J. Cadima. Principal component analy-sis: a review and recent developments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 374(2065), Article 20150202. 2016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0202
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0202
[23] Addinsoft. XLSTAT statistical software (Version 2019) [Computer software]. Paris, France: Addinsoft, 2019. https://www.xlstat.com.
[24] S. Nasiripour, O. Dayani, M. Soflaei Shahrbabak, & P. Dadvar. Feeding milk thistle (Silybum marianum) seed powder to fattening lambs: Effects on growth perfor-mance, digestibility, and rumen metabolism. SSRN Preprint, 2024. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4782985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4782985
[25] M. F. W. Festing, & D. G. Altman. Guidelines for the design and statistical analysis of experiments using la-boratory animals. ILAR Journal, 43(4), 244–258. 2002. https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar.43.4.244 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar.43.4.244
[26] N. I. S. da Silva, P. D. O. Lima, F. J. C. Souza, M. W. F. Pereira, R. H. R. Moreira, et al. Phytogenic additives increase performance and improve the tenderness of lamb meat: A meta-analytical and systematic review approach. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 2025. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2025v46n1p231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2025v46n1p231
[27] J. Charan & N. Kantharia. How to calculate sample size in animal studies? Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics (Vol. 4, Issue 4, pp.303–306). 2013 https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-500X.119726. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-500X.119726
[28] F. Hassan, M. Arshad, M. A. Ebeid, A. U. Rehman, S. Khan, S. Shahid, & W. Yang. Phytogenic Additives Can Modulate Rumen Microbiome to Mediate Fermen-tation Kinetics and Methanogenesis. Frontiers in Vet-erinary Science, 7, Article 575801, 2020. file:///C:/Users/HP/Downloads/fvets-07-575801.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.575801
[29] E. R. Coelho, M. V. Cunha, M. V. F. Santos, J. P. Fé-rrer, J. R. C. Silva, T. R. Torres, … D. K. A. Silva. Phytogenic additive to improve nutrient digestibility, carcass traits and meat quality in sheep finished on rangeland. Livestock Science, 241, 104268, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104268 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104268
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Charmo Journal of Natural Sciences and Technologies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
